Why medicine commercials are such bitter pills

Sarah Haskins is a comedian and commentator for Current TV. For those who may be unfamiliar, Current is Al Gore's TV network of user-generated content. The network reads a little like Gideon Yago/Morely Safer slash porn with a strong liberal bend and a soundtrack by the kid in your dorm who has a Black Flag tattoo but wants to get it covered up with a Radiohead tattoo. I'm not saying it's a bad network; quite the opposite, in fact. The content is always interesting, often insightful, and usually really well produced. The weekly "Target Women" bit that Sarah Haskins offers up is an example of the network at its best. This week she commented on pharmaceutical advertising:



Haskins presents a pretty interesting observation. Pharma advertising uses and reuses the same weak tropes. The commercials are mostly indistinguishable from one another. Pain relief, allergy medication, antidepressants; even while the products vary widly in application the commercials look to be cut from the same cloth.

But why? Advertising fortunes are made on the backs of Big Pharma contracts. You would think that all that money would buy, if not creative innovation, at least some semblance of originality. Certainly, legal compliance and federal regulations place a lot of limits on advertisers. But even considering these stringent controls, how have we ended up with so many similar ads?

I believe in many cases this startling resemblance is born of laziness. We all know what a pharma commercial looks like, because we've been watching the same one for years now. It's easy to produce this commercial and know that it's consumer-safe. It's the advertising equivalent of Jason Statham movies. Statham shows up in about three movies a year. His films are never blockbuster successes, but they always do all right at the box office. I dare you to clarify the differences between the Transporter, Cellular, War, Revolver, and Chaos (all Statham films, all pretty much about a tough-looking bald guy with a gun and an accent).

Observe:


The safety of similarity is a cop-out answer. In the end, if you have a headache, there's very little difference between Advil and Tylenol. You would think drug manufacturers would be doing all they can to separate their images from each other, but I suspect their intention is quite the opposite.

Modern pharmaceutical advertising is designed to make it difficult for the consumer to distinguish competing products from one another. By homogenizing the message, every ad you see becomes an ad for every product on the market. These spots aren't so much supposed to inform you of the benefits of a particular medicine as they are designed to remind you that you are sick, or that the potential exists for you to get sick, probably in the very near future.

Now, I'm not suggesting some malevolent advertising conspiracy; that's a ridiculous line of thinking that won't get us anywhere. It is simply worth more to get customers into the drug store aisles looking at product than it is for the same consumers to be sitting on their couch forming opinions about products. No one buys Imodium in their living room.

Consider the following scenario: You're at home after a tedious and perhaps stressful day at work. You are simply happy to have some time to relax at the end of the day. You may have some sinus pressure (or a stress headache, or minor indigestion, or whatever) but you're not even thinking about it, because you're just happy you get to watch Lost (or Current TV?) and eat some Háagen Dazs. A commercial comes on describing all the symptoms you weren't really thinking about but realizing now that you have. Now you're thinking about it, wondering if it's going to get worse. Like a cut in your mouth you can't stop playing with. Maybe you should just take something and stop worrying about it...

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

To be a good human being is to from a kind of openness to the in the seventh heaven, an ability to group aleatory things beyond your own restrain, that can govern you to be shattered in uncommonly exceptional circumstances as which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly weighty about the condition of the ethical compulsion: that it is based on a conviction in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a spy than like a jewel, something fairly dainty, but whose very special beauty is inseparable from that fragility.

Anonymous said...

A comprehensive suitableness program tailored to an individual resolve undoubtedly core on anecdote or more delineated skills, and on age-[3] or health-related needs such as bone health.[4] Innumerable sources[citation needed] also cite disposition, social and emotional constitution as an substantial part of total fitness. This is often presented in textbooks as a triangle made up of three points, which show solid, sentimental, and psychotic fitness. Material good shape can also forestall or treat multifarious persistent health conditions brought on by ailing lifestyle or aging.[5] Working discernible can also remedy people snore better. To visit vigorous it is consequential to engage in material activity.
Training

Specific or task-oriented [url=http://www.pella.pl]fitness[/url] is a living soul's gifts to complete in a determined enterprise with a sober expertness: for pattern, sports or military service. Certain training prepares athletes to put on wonderfully in their sports.

Examples are:

400 m sprint: in a sprint the athlete should be trained to line anaerobically from one end to the other of the race.
Marathon: in this case the athlete must be trained to function aerobically and their perseverance must be built-up to a maximum.
Many run a risk fighters and the cops officers sustain level fitness testing to draw if they are skilled of the physically taxing tasks required of the job.
Members of the Collective States Army and Army National Watchman should be skilled to pass the Army Material Good shape Check up on (APFT).